Bagaimana Kemampuan Matematika Siswa Yang Diasses Secara Holistik
Abstract
Hasil belajar berdasarkan standar proses NCTM (2000) menunjukkan kemampuan matematika yang luas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa baik kemampuan matematika siswa di SMP Negeri di kelas VIII di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar, Sulawesi Barat, dengan menggunakan penilaian holistik. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 530 siswa, terdiri dari 165 siswa pada uji coba terbatas dan 365 siswa pada uji coba diperluas, dan penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian dan pengembangan (R&D pendidikan). Instrumen penilaian holistik dibuat berdasarkan model modifikasi Oreondo. Data dianalisis dengan menghitung parameter karakteristik masing-masing elemen menggunakan program PARSCALE. Selanjutnya, metode Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) digunakan untuk memperkirakan kemampuan siswa. Untuk menguji validitas isi, formula Aiken digunakan, untuk menguji unidimensionalitas, dan untuk menguji validitas konstruk, Lisrel digunakan Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik alat penilaian holistik maupun model yang diciptakan valid dan dapat diandalkan. Kemampuan siswa mencapai ketuntasan klasik secara deskriptif. Dua indikator utama menunjukkan bahwa penilaian holistik efektif: tes sampel independen menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan dan tanggapan positif siswa terhadap penggunaan model penilaian holistik dalam pembelajaran matematika.
Downloads
References
Akib, Irwaretn. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Budaya Bugis Makassar. Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Akubuilo, F. (2012). Holistic Assessment of Student's Learning Outcome. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(12).
Allin, L., & Turnock, C. (2007). Assessing student performance in Work-Based Learning. Diakses pada tanggal 16 Februari 2014 dari www.practicebasedlearning.org
Aminah, S., Sujadi, I., & Subanti, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa kelas VIII pada materi himpunan. Journal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 15–22.
Beswick, K. (2008). Influencing teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics for numeracy to students with mathematics learning difficulties. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 3–20.
Broadfoot, P., & Black, P. (2004). Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 7–26.
Cai, J., et al. (Eds.). (2009). Effective mathematics teaching from teachers perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clements, M. D., & Cord, B. A. (2013). Assessment guiding learning: developing graduate qualities in an experiential learning programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 114–124.
De Lange, J. (1987). Mathematics insight and meaning. Ultrecht: OW & OC.
Djazuli, A. (1999). Kebijakan strategi Konwil Jawa Barat dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas guru matematika. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika, FPMIPA IKIP Bandung, 6–7 Agustus.
Endarmoko, E. (2009). Tesaurus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Farhan, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Keefektifan PBL dan IBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan representasi matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 227–240.
Faryadi, Q. (2012). The architecture of interactive multimedia courseware: an empirical-based approach: phase two. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(15), 72–78.
Gao, K. D., Du, C. L., & Liu, S. Y. (2012). An empirical mathematic model of drums cutting torque. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 46(2), 785–789.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamental of item response theory. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hendryadi, & Suryani. (2014). Structural equation modeling dengan lisrel 8.80 pedoman untuk pemula. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara.
Ishak, N., & Awang, M. M. (2017). The relationship of student learning styles and achievement in history subject. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(3), 3372–3377.
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (pysthots) peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12.
Jamalong, A. (2015). Upaya meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran pendidikan kewarganegaraan melalui metode diskusi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 21(1), 27–38.
Jennings, S., & Dunne, R. (1999). Math stories, real stories, real-life stories. Diakses dari http://www.ex.ac.uk/telematics/T3/maths/actar01.htm
Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): Implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131–141.
Killian, M., & Bastas, H. (2015). The effects of an active learning strategy on students' attitudes and students' performances in introductory sociology classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 53–67.
Kurniawan, H. (2012). Upaya peningkatan efektivitas pembelajaran matematika melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe team assisted individualization (TAI) pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri Sidomulyo Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (hlm. MP-370–MP-376). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Lee, Y. J. (2011). A study on the effect of teaching innovation on learning effectiveness with learning satisfaction as a mediator. Takming University of Science and Technology, 9(2), Taipei, Taiwan.
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
McCormick, N. J., Clark, L. M., & Raines, J. M. (2015). Engaging students in critical thinking and problem solving: A brief review of the literature. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(4), 100–113.
Mulyono, D., Asmawi, M., & Nuriah, T. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching, student facilitator and explaining and learning independence on mathematical learning results by controlling the initial ability of students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 199–205.
Naga, D. S. (1992). Pengantar teori skor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Oreondo, L. L. (1984). Evaluating educational outcomes. Manila, Philippines: Rex Bookstore, Inc.
O'Toole, K. (2007). Assessment in experiential learning: The case of a public policy internship. Education Research and Perspectives, 34(2), 51.
Pehlivan, A., & Durgut, M. (2017). The effect of logical-mathematical intelligence on financial accounting achievement according to multiple intelligence theory. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 4(3), 132–139.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya: Untuk peneliti, praktisi pengukuran dan pengujian, mahasiswa pascasarjana. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Retnawati, H., Arlinwibowo, J., & Apino, E. (2018). Strategy and implementation of character education in senior high schools and vocational high schools. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 370–397.
Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers' difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33–48.
Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers' strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 257–276.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Sri Widiastuti, I. A. Md. (2016). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of formative assessment to promote active learning. The ASIAN EFL Journal, 3.
Sri Widiastuti, I. A. Md. (2017). Teachers’ understanding of formative assessment. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni, 45(1), Juni 2017.
Sugiman, S. (2008). Koneksi matematik dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah menengah pertama. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 56–66.
Suyata, S. (2017, November). Teacher managerial leadership for improving school and classroom quality. Dalam International Conference on Education (Vol. 1, No. 01).
Tang, S. J., & Hsieh, F. J. (2014). The cultural notion of teacher education: Future lower secondary teachers’ beliefs on the nature of mathematics, the learning of mathematics and mathematics achievement. Dalam Akker, Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn (hlm. 231–253). Dordrecht: Springer.
Turgut, S., & Turgut, I. G. (2018). The effects of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 663–680.
Wahid, S. N. S., & Yusof, Y. (2013). Math anxiety among students in higher education level. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 123, 232–237.
Yerizon, Y., Putra, A. A., & Subhan, M. (2018). Student responses toward student worksheets based on discovery learning for students with intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligence. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012113
