Analisis Butir Soal Mata Pelajaran Fisika Pada Siswa Kelas X MA Al-Muzakarah Toniku Kec. Jailolo Selatan (Penelitian Survey Pada Soal Ujian Akhir Semster Ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023)
Abstract
This research is a quantitative research using a survey method. Data collection techniques with documentation. The subjects in this study are all questions and multiple-choice answer sheets for the odd semester final exam of Class X Physics subject. This study analyzes the level of difficulty, differentiation, and effectiveness of tricksters. Quantitative analysis of multiple-choice questions was carried out using the ANATES version 4.00 program.
The results of the study showed that out of a total of 15 multiple-choice questions reviewed from the level of difficulty, there were 1 question or 7% in the difficult or high category, 13 questions or 86% in the medium category, and 1 question or 7% in the low or easy category. Based on the discriminating power, it shows that there are 6 question items (40%) in the very good category, 5 question items (33%) in the good category, 1 question item (7%) in the medium category, 1 question item (7%) in the bad category and 2 question items (13%) in the negative or non-discriminatory category. Based on the effectiveness of the deceiver, it was shown that the deceiver had a total of 60 options out of 15 multiple-choice questions that were tested, 55 options functioned well from 15 questions, and 5 options had poor function from 15 questions. Thus, the results of the study show that the Odd Semester Final Exam questions for Physics subjects are 86% good questions and 14% bad questions.
Downloads
References
Alifa, R., & Purwana. (2018). Keunggulan teori tes klasik dalam menganalisis kualitas instrumen penilaian.
Arikunto S. 2012. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Astuti. (2019). Permasalahan umum dalam analisis instrumen penilaian di sekolah
Azevedo Oliveira, & Beites. (2019). Keterbatasan teori tes klasik dalam menganalisis kualitas instrumen penilaian.
Djumali, dkk. (2014). Pendidikan sebagai persiapan memecahkan problem kehidupan.
Kemendikbud. (2017). pentingnya analisis instrumen penilaian akhir semester.
Kartowagiran, Badrun. (2012). Penulisan butir soal. Makalah disampaikan pada Pelatihan penulisan dan analisis butir soal bagi sumber daya PNS Dik-Rekinpeg, di Hotel Kawanua Aeritel, Jakarta pada tanggal 10 Oktober 2012.
Kusaeri dan Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu.
Ngatman. 2017. Evaluasi Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan. Jawa Tengah: CV Sanu Untung.
Sudaryono. (2019). Dasar- Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu.
Sudijono, Anas. (2010). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sudijono, Anas (2011)Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitati, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.https://massugiyantojambi. wordpress.com/2011/04/15/teori-motivasi/.
Suharsimi, rikunto. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suharsimi, Arikunto. (2013). Dasar - Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Surapranata, Sumarna. (2009). Analisis, Validasi, Reabilitas dan Interprestasi Hasil Tes;Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Susetyo, Budi. (2015). Prosedur Penyusunan dan AnalisisTes untuk Penilaian Hasil Belajar Bidang Kognitif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Tim. (2016). Pedoman Tugas Akhir. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Werdiningsih, Galuh, (2015). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester Gasal Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas XII IPS SMAN 2 Banguntapan Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Skripsi, tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Widoyoko, Eko Putro. (2012). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.