Performa Skema Orde Dua dan Orde Empat Finite Difference Method dalam Simulasi Vortex Shedding

  • Chindy Eka Putri Program Studi Teknologi Daya Gerak, Fakultas Teknik dan Teknologi Pertahanan, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Romie Oktovianus Bura Program Studi Teknologi Daya Gerak, Fakultas Teknik dan Teknologi Pertahanan, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
  • Pranowo Pranowo Program Studi Informatika, Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
  • Lalu Aan Sasaka Akbar Program Studi Teknologi Daya Gerak, Fakultas Teknik dan Teknologi Pertahanan, Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia
Keywords: Finite Difference Method, ; orde dua, orde empat, vortex shedding, akurasi, computational cost

Abstract

Pemodelan fenomena vortex shedding memerlukan skema diskritisasi yang mampu menangkap dinamika aliran secara akurat sekaligus efisien secara komputasi. Finite Difference Method (FDM) dengan skema orde dua dan orde empat merupakan dua pendekatan yang umum digunakan. Namun, perbandingan performa komprehensif keduanya masih terbatas dalam literatur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan performa skema FDM orde dua dan orde empat dalam simulasi vortex shedding berdasarkan akurasi terhadap parameter fisis (bilangan Strouhal , koefisien drag , koefisien lift ) serta computational cost yang meliputi kebutuhan resolusi grid dan waktu komputasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur komparatif dengan menganalisis data dari penelitian terdahulu yang relevan yang mencakup perbandingan galat relatif vortisitas, nilai , , , serta informasi computational cost. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada ukuran grid yang sama, skema orde empat menghasilkan galat relatif yang lebih kecil dibandingkan skema orde dua. Pada , skema orde empat menghasilkan  dan , sangat dekat dengan data eksperimen. Selain aspek akurasi, ditinjau pula computational cost pada masing-masing skema dan ditemukan bahwa skema orde empat membutuhkan waktu komputasi 5–20% lebih lama per iterasi. Implikasi penelitian ini adalah pemilihan skema numerik perlu mempertimbangkan kompromi antara akurasi dan computational cost, dengan skema orde empat direkomendasikan untuk simulasi yang memerlukan presisi tinggi pada . Penelitian lanjutan disarankan untuk memperluas rentang bilangan Reynolds hingga regime turbulen dan mengembangkan skema adaptif berbasis gradien lokal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, C. R., & Reider, M. B. (1996). A high order explicit method for the computation of flow about a circular cylinder. Journal of Computational Physics, 125(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0089

Aslan, E., İnan, İ., Kandemir, I., & Güven, H. R. (2018). Numerical analysis of flow around bluff bodies with 4 th and 2 nd order compact formulations. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 22(5), 1234–1252.

Balakrishna, S., & Schultz, W. W. (2021). Finite differences for higher order derivatives of low resolution data. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 190, 714–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.06.011

Baranyi, L., & R L Lewis. (2006). Comparison of a grid-based CFD method and vortex dynamics predictions of low Reynolds number cylinder flows. The Aeronautical Journal, 110(1103), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000004371

Belov, A., Martinelli, L., & Jameson, A. (1995). A new implicit algorithm with multigrid for unsteady incompressible flow calculations. 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-49

Calhoun, D. (2002). A cartesian grid method for solving the equations in irregular regions. Journal of Computational Physics, 176(2), 231–275. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6970

Chen, Z., Liu, Y., & Sung, H. J. (2025). Influence of Darcy and Reynolds numbers on flow past a porous circular cylinder. Physics of Fluids, 37(8), 083635. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0284671

El-metwaly, A. R., & Kamal, M. A. (2024). A brief review of numerical methods for solving the boundary value problems of PDE. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2847(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2847/1/012001

Ghomizad, M. B., Kor, H., & Fukagata, K. (2021). A structured adaptive mesh refinement strategy with a sharp interface direct-forcing immersed boundary method for moving boundary problems. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, 16(2), JFST0014. https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.2021jfst0014

Guan, T., Chen, J., Liu, J., & Xu, C. (2024). A second-order-accuracy finite difference scheme for numerical computation on two-dimensional three-neighboring-node unstructured grids. Physics of Fluids, 36(3), 036109. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0193667

Hoffman, K. A., & Chiang, S. T. (2000). Computational fluid dynamics volume 1 (Fourth Edition). Engineer Education System.

Jordan, S. K., & Fromm, J. E. (1972). Oscillatory drag, lift, and torque on a circular cylinder in a uniform flow. Physics of Fluids, 15(3), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1693918

Kostecki, S. W. (2011). Numerical analysis of hydrodynamic forces due to flow instability at lift gate. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 11(4), 943–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60088-0

Kumar, N., Kumar, S., & Bhumkar, Y. G. (2024). Analysis of non-uniform laminar flow past a circular cylinder on the flow and sound field evolution using direct. Acta Mechanica, 235, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03735-8

Kurtulus, D. F. (2016). On the wake pattern of symmetric airfoils for different incidence angles at Re = 1000. Micro Air Vehicles, 8(2), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756829316653700

Li, S. (2025). Sound emission in a quasi-steady transonic turbulent flow pas a circular cylinder. Physical Review Fluids, 10(3), 34603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.10.034603

Linnick, M. N., & Fasel, H. F. (2005). A high-order immersed interface method for simulating unsteady incompressible flows on irregular domains. Journal of Computational Physics, 204(1), 157–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.09.017

Liu, C., Zheng, X., & Sung, C. H. (1998). Preconditioned multigrid methods for unsteady incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 139(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1997.5859

Liu, J., Ma, W., Jin, L., Liu, X., & Li, T. (2023). Experimental and numerical investigation on the wake flow and vortex shedding of a rotating circular cylinder. Physics of Fluids, 35(7), 074114. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0157682

Luo, Z. (2022). Computation of two-dimensional Poisson equation using the third-rrder discrete scheme of finite difference method based on node set vector. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2381(1), 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2381/1/012039

Park, J., Kwon, K., & Choi, H. (1998). Numerical solutions of flow past a circular cylinder at Reynolds numbers up to 160. KSME International Journal, 12(6), 1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942594

Plogmann, J., Brenner, O., & Jenny, P. (2024). Spectral adjoint-based assimilation of sparse data in unsteady simulations of turbulent flows. Physics of Fluids, 36(105130), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227328

Shen, Y., Zha, G., & Chen, X. (2009). High order conservative differencing for viscous terms and the application to vortex-induced vibration flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(22), 8283–8300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.004

Sikien, E. R., Abdullah, A., Zulkafli, M. F., & Rahim, M. Z. (2018). The effects of vortex shedding on the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(24), 9344–9351.

Stålberg, E., Brüger, A., Lötstedt, P., Johansson, A. V., & Henningson, D. S. (2006). High order accurate solution of flow past a circular cylinder. Journal of Scientific Computing, 27(1–3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-005-9043-y

Tezduyar, T. E., Liou, J., & Ganjoo, D. K. (1990). Incompressible flow computations based on the vorticity-stream function and velocity-pressure formulations. Computers & Structures, 35(4), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(90)90069-E

Uralde-guinea, X., Parra, Y., Uriarte, I., & Fernández-gámiz, U. (2026). Comparison between cylinder and ellipse at 0 degrees angle of attack for low Reynolds numbers. Measurement Journal, 258, 119250. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119250

Wang, J., & Xiong, Y. (2026). The role of flow separation in the forces on a circular cylinder with one or two control rods. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3170, 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3170/1/012032

Wang, Z. J. Ã. (2007). High-order methods for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured grids. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 43(1–3), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.05.001

Whalen, M. (2025). A finite difference approach and its error estimate to the two-dimensional Poisson equation for dirichlet boundary conditions. American Journal of Undergraduate Research, 22(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2025.140

Xu, D., Liu, J., Wu, Y., & Ji, C. (2023). A high ‑ efficiency discretized immersed boundary method for moving boundaries in incompressible flows. Scientific Reports, 13, 1699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28878-5

Zhang, H., Jia, L., Fu, S., Xiang, X., & Wang, L. (2023). Vortex shedding analysis of flows past forced-oscillation cylinder with dynamic mode decomposition. Physics of Fluids, 35(5), 053618. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0153302

Published
2026-06-19
How to Cite
Putri, C., Oktovianus Bura, R., Pranowo, P., & Akbar, L. A. (2026). Performa Skema Orde Dua dan Orde Empat Finite Difference Method dalam Simulasi Vortex Shedding. KUANTUM: Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Sains Fisika, 7(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.63976/kuantum.v7i1.1401