Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Berbasis Deep Learning Untuk Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kreatif Siswa SMA
Abstract
Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kreatif menjadi tuntutan utama pembelajaran matematika abad ke-21, terutama pada jenjang SMA yang menuntut kesiapan siswa dalam menghadapi tantangan akademik dan profesional yang kompleks. Namun, praktik pembelajaran di kelas masih didominasi pendekatan konvensional yang kurang memberi ruang interaksi bermakna dan eksplorasi ide siswa. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan untuk menjawab kebutuhan akan model pembelajaran inovatif yang mampu menstimulasi kolaborasi, pemecahan masalah, serta elaborasi ide melalui pemanfaatan teknologi mutakhir seperti deep learning. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengimplementasikan dan mengevaluasi efektivitas model pembelajaran kolaboratif berbasis deep learning dalam meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa SMA pada materi matematika. Penelitian menggunakan desain quasi-experimental dengan subjek 68 siswa kelas XI yang dibagi dalam kelompok eksperimen dan kontrol. Instrumen terdiri atas tes berpikir kritis, tes berpikir kreatif, lembar observasi aktivitas kolaboratif, serta log aktivitas pembelajaran berbantuan platform deep learning. Prosedur pengumpulan data mencakup pretest–posttest, observasi kelas, dan analisis jejak digital pembelajaran. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji ANCOVA dan analisis kualitatif tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang belajar melalui model kolaboratif berbasis deep learning mengalami peningkatan signifikan pada kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif dibandingkan siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran konvensional. Analisis kualitatif mengungkap bahwa visualisasi otomatis, rekomendasi pemecahan masalah, serta umpan balik adaptif dari sistem deep learning mendorong interaksi kolaboratif yang lebih kaya dan eksploratif. Implikasinya, integrasi deep learning dalam pembelajaran matematika direkomendasikan sebagai strategi pedagogis inovatif untuk memperkuat kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Guru perlu mendapatkan pelatihan tentang desain aktivitas kolaboratif digital, sementara sekolah perlu menyediakan infrastruktur teknologi yang memadai.
Downloads
References
Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2021). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: Evidence from high-performing East-Asian systems. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 1–22.
Alabsi, A. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-driven adaptive learning and its effects on students’ thinking skills. Computers & Education Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100047.
Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2020). Design-based research: A practical guide for education researchers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 103–120.
Amir, W., & Habsyi, R. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Inquiri Untuk Meningkatkan Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Operasi Hitung Bilangan Bulat Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 47 Halmahera Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika (JIMAT), 5(1), 133 -145. https://doi.org/10.63976/jimat.v5i1.729
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2016). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Baneres, D., Rodríguez-González, M. E., & Guerrero-Roldán, A. (2023). AI-supported feedback and its impact on higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 45–59.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2018). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2015). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues. Houghton Mifflin.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using SPSS (5th ed.). Sage.
Fischer, C., Pardos, Z. A., & Baker, R. S. (2020). Applications of deep learning in education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 12(3), 1–30.
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2018). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 27–35.
Habsyi, R. ., Sudiman, A. ., Ikram, M. ., Saleh, R. R. ., Triyono, A. ., & La Nani, K. . (2025). The Creative Thinking Process of Students with Adversity Quotient Personality and Metacognition Level in Solving Open-Ended Problems Reviewed from the Information Processing Theory. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 17(2), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v17i2.7678
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
Lee, J., & Chen, W. (2021). Effects of collaborative problem-solving supported by AI-based scaffolding on students’ creativity. Computers & Education, 172, 104–261.
OECD. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results: Creative thinking. OECD Publishing.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2018). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills. National Academies Press.
Santrock, J. W. (2022). Adolescence. McGraw-Hill.
Sawyer, R. K. (2017). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2021). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in the age of AI. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(1), 7–22.
Song, Y., & Kong, S. C. (2017). Affordances and constraints of BYOD in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 180–193.
Tang, T., Wang, S., & Lin, Y. (2021). AI-supported collaborative learning in secondary classrooms. Computers & Education, 170, 104–219.
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1978)
.png)
